Results Most studies compared SR to dictation and transcription (DT) in radiology, and heterogeneity across studies was high. Twenty-three articles met inclusion criteria from a pool of 441. Outcome variables analyzed included dictation and editing time, document turnaround time (TAT), SR accuracy, error rates per document, and economic benefit. Methods Studies published prior to December 2014 reporting clinical documentation using SR were identified by searching Scopus, Compendex and Inspect, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Objective To review literature assessing the impact of speech recognition (SR) on clinical documentation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |